Light curtains (ESPE) — type 2 versus type 4, and the safety-distance formula
Light curtains (ESPE) — type 2 versus type 4, and the safety-distance formula
The guide on guard interlocking and locking switches covers guarding of a movable guard (door, flap). This article covers a different type of guarding that uses no physical guard at all: the light curtain, a form of electro-sensitive protective equipment (ESPE) per IEC 61496, which monitors a hazardous zone with an optical curtain of infrared beams.
Type 2 versus type 4
Among others, IEC 61496 distinguishes two commonly used light curtain types, which differ in the maximum achievable reliability level and in their self-test approach:
| Type | Max. performance level (ISO 13849-1) | Max. SIL (IEC 62061) | Self-test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 | PLc | SIL2 | Periodic self-test |
| Type 4 | PLe | SIL3 | Continuous, faster fault detection |
Which type is required does not follow from a free choice but from the machine's risk assessment (per ISO 12100) and the resulting required performance level or SIL — just as described in the ISO 13849-1 guide. A type 2 light curtain must not be used where the risk assessment requires a higher level (PLd/PLe or SIL3).
The safety-distance formula (ISO 13855)
A light curtain must be mounted far enough from the hazard that the machine has come to a complete stop before a body part moving through the light curtain can reach the hazard. ISO 13855 gives the formula:
$$S = K \times T + C$$
- S — minimum required safety distance (mm).
- K — approach-speed constant (mm/s): 2000 mm/s for the fastest achievable hand/arm movement, or 1600 mm/s when the calculated distance is already ≥ 500 mm and a full-body approach is more realistic than a fast hand movement.
- T — total response time: the machine's stopping time plus the light curtain's own response time.
- C — additional distance, depending on the light curtain's resolution (the smallest object the curtain can still detect). For hand detection, C = 8 × (d − 14) is generally used, with d the resolution in mm.
The coarser the light curtain's resolution (i.e. the larger d), the larger the additional distance C must be — a light curtain that only detects large objects must be mounted further from the hazard than a finer curtain that already detects a finger.
Practical relevance
When assessing or installing a light curtain, check whether the chosen type (2 or 4) matches the required performance level/SIL from the risk assessment, and whether the actual mounting distance to the hazard is at least equal to the calculated S from the ISO 13855 formula — including the machine's real (measured, not assumed) stopping time in T.
Common mistakes
- Using a type 2 light curtain where the risk assessment requires PLd/PLe or SIL3 — this type does not reach that level.
- Estimating rather than measuring the machine's stopping time when determining T — an overly optimistic assumed stopping time results in a safety distance that is too small and unsafe.
- Using the wrong K value — using 2000 mm/s for a full-body approach (instead of 1600 mm/s at an already calculated distance ≥ 500 mm) generally results in an unnecessarily large but not unsafe deviation, whereas the opposite mistake (using 1600 mm/s where 2000 mm/s applies) undermines the safety margin.
- Not accounting for the light curtain's resolution in C — a lower resolution (coarser detection) requires a larger additional distance, which, if overlooked, leads to a safety distance that is too small.
Related
Further reading
- IEC 62061 / ISO 13849-1SIL versus Performance Level (PL) — which framework for which safety function
- NEN-EN-IEC 60974Arc welding — electrical safety and open-circuit voltage
- IEC 60364-6 / NEN-EN-IEC 61557-4Protective conductor continuity — the R1+R2 method
- IEC 61439IEC 61439 versus NEN 1010 — manufacturing standard for the panel, installation standard for the installation
- IEC 61557IEC 61557 — the standard series for protective-measure test equipment
- ISO 13849-1ISO 13849-1 — Performance Levels (PLa-PLe) of safety controls